There are SIRE 2.0 questions which require the inspector to interview officers and crew on aspects of their duties which may not be undertaken during the inspection, such as the use and demonstration of Life Saving Appliances (LSA) or Fire Fighting Appliances (FFA). The SIRE 2.0 process requires that the inspector observes officers and crew performing their normal day-to-day activities. One of the benefits of SIRE 2.0 is the data provided through purchased SIRE 2.0 reports will enable report recipients to undertake considerable analysis of an operator’s managed fleet, if they wish to do so. OCIMF will undertake analysis of anonymised inspection data for its internal use only to evaluate the effectiveness of the SIRE 2.0 inspection programme and identify inspection trends and emerging concerns, which could inform the development of industry best practices and SIRE 2.0 Campaign questions. It considers information provided by the vessel operator through the Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ) and Pre-Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ) when selecting the pool of questions that will be used by an inspector for any given inspection. The inspection compiler algorithm does not consider past inspection performance of an individual vessel or a fleet of vessels when generating a Compiled Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (CVIQ). OCIMF does not perform any datamining or analysis of inspection data to identify concerns within any individual company fleet. Each inspection will be compiled to include all core questions and a selection of rotational questions applicable to a vessel to be inspected. The OCIMF bowtie risk assessment process was used to risk rank and categorise all SIRE 2.0 Questions into either core or rotational. The OCIMF Quality Assurance team will be able to identify and follow up on poor inspection management practices by vessel operators, submitting companies and inspectors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |